Skip to content

Authorization · orthopedics + pain management

In development

The packet should be complete before anyone submits.

Prior authorization and surgical/procedure readiness for orthopedics and pain management. AdminQ assembles policy checks, H&P, imaging, and medical-necessity language into a packet a human still submits.

The moment it solves

A missing scale is not a coding problem. It is a documentation-risk problem.

For interventional pain, Traditional Medicare ESI records in the sampled set failed a strict core documentation check more often than not. That is why this product exists for pain management as well as orthopedics — not a claim that AdminQ generated a return on those claims.

How it works

A complete packet. A human still submits.

  1. 01

    Know the payer rule

    DataQorp declares policy. Observed historical behavior is a separate column — never presented as the rule.

  2. 02

    Assemble the packet

    Orthopedic surgery and interventional pain share the same pipeline: H&P, imaging, medical necessity, and the gaps that would fail review.

  3. 03

    A human submits

    AdminQ does not quietly file authorizations. Completeness is the product; submission remains a person.

Evidence of value

Classed evidence. Not every number is cash.

MEASURED PERFORMANCE

52.1%

Strict core documentation fail in sampled retrievable Traditional Medicare ESI records

Why this matters for pain management and orthopedic procedure readiness. n=190 sampled retrievable records. Not a claim that AdminQ generated a return.

How this was measured

OpAgent Benchmark: Traditional Medicare ESI documentation analysis. Strict core documentation fail rate in sampled retrievable records.

Sample: n=190

A documentation-fail rate is not AdminQ-generated return and not observed recoupment.

Source: OpAgent Benchmark

EXTRAPOLATED RISK

~$33.8k

Extrapolated documentation-risk amount

Out of $66.2k Medicare-paid ESI during the observed window. Not observed recoupment. Not recovered cash.

How this was measured

OpAgent Benchmark: extrapolated documentation-risk amount from the Traditional Medicare ESI documentation analysis.

Sample: n=190 sampled retrievable records

Period: Observed Medicare ESI window

Extrapolated risk, not observed recoupment, not recovered cash, not AdminQ-generated return.

Source: OpAgent Benchmark

Documentation gaps in the ESI analysis

  • Baseline objective scale
  • Conservative care duration
  • Same-scale follow-up
  • ≥50% relief before repeat
  • Long-course PCP notification

Methodology / caveat

The Traditional Medicare ESI analysis is a why-this-matters block for pain management and procedure readiness. It is not observed recoupment, not recovered cash, and not a return AdminQ generated. The dollar figure is extrapolated risk from Medicare-paid ESI in the observed window.

OpAgent Benchmark · AdminQ · extrapolated risk ≠ recoupment

Where it connects

The rest of OpAgent is already in the room.

  • OpAgent Essentials

    Where a ready packet can surface as a decision on Today.

  • DataQorp

    Declared policy, kept visually separate from observed behavior.

  • CodeIQ OR

    The case the authorization was supposed to cover.

  • Pre-Op Optimization

    Readiness work that should happen before the packet is even built.